Page 1 of 1

Decode error for airprobe

Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 7:13 am
by sk80
Hi,

I have installed gnuradio 3.7, aiprobe and zmania patch on ubuntu 14.04

I get following errors while running airprobe

---

./gsm_receive_hackrf_3.7.py -s 1e6 -f 937.8e6
linux; GNU C++ version 4.8.2; Boost_105400; UHD_003.008.004-0-unknown

gr-osmosdr v0.1.x-xxx-xunknown (0.1.5git) gnuradio 3.7.5
built-in source types: file osmosdr fcd rtl rtl_tcp uhd miri hackrf bladerf rfspace airspy
[bladeRF source] Using nuand LLC bladeRF #0 SN 01ce...8d2e FW v1.8.0 FPGA v0.1.2
[INFO @ bladerf.c:604] Clamping bandwidth to 1500000Hz
sample rate: 1000000
Using Volk machine: sse4_2_64_orc
gr::log :WARN: fractional_interpolator_cc0 - fractional_interpolator is deprecated. Please use fractional_resampler instead.
Key: 'ad6a3ec2b442e400'
Configuration: '0B'
Configuration TS: 0
configure_receiver
gr::buffer::allocate_buffer: warning: tried to allocate
115 items of size 568. Due to alignment requirements
512 were allocated. If this isn't OK, consider padding
your structure to a power-of-two bytes.
On this platform, our allocation granularity is 4096 bytes.
coarse tuned to: 223364 Hz
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 11
coarse tuned to: 210280 Hz
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 11
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 12
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 10
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 12
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 11
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 11
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 12
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 11
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 12
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 9
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 12
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 11
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 11
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 9
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 11
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 11
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 11
sch.c:260 ERR: conv_decode 10

------
Any Idea on how to resolve this?

I am newbie to SDRs, any guidance suggestions are appreciated
Many Thanks
-sk80

Re: Decode error for airprobe

Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 7:26 am
by sk80
Thanks Jon,

Sorry for late reply, I was not with my bladeRF for quite a while.
I tried 2e6 and also 3e6, but unfortunately result was the same.

I will update if I am able to solve this.

Thanks again,
Sachin